Friday, January 25, 2008

Competitive Populism Only Perpetuates Poverty: Dr. JP

In their unabashed quest to get into power at any cost, traditional political parties are indulging in competitive populism, charged Lok Satta Party President Dr. Jayaprakash Narayan today.
Pretending to be benefactors, politicians treated people as mendicants and doled out sops and handouts as if they owned the money. Unfortunately, Governments and the media conveniently glossed over the fact that politicians lorded over money collected from people themselves. They remained silent even as politicians exploited people's poverty, illiteracy and ignorance.

Dr. JP said that that no one would dispute that the State should protect the poor and the dispossessed in an underdeveloped country like ours. But it should not be at the cost of the Government's fundamental and primary duty of eliminating poverty and enabling people to stand on their own feet with dignity. "But in India politicians have developed a vested interest in perpetuating poverty and lost sight of the country's future".

Dr. JP was reacting to the sops being showered on people by both the Congress and the Telugu Desam Party with an eye on the elections to the Assembly and the Lok Sabha in the near future. If one party promises loans at 'pavala vaddi', the other rivals it with '10 paise vaddi'. If one offers to write off interest, the other promises to write off loans plus interest. If one promises subsidies on a product or service, the other offers to provide it free of cost. If one arranges free marriages, the other offers a golden 'tali'.

"What the nation needs today is a comprehensive social security scheme and not piecemeal and ad hoc relief".

Dr. JP said "doles and handouts will not mitigate the suffering of the poor or enable them to live with dignity unless Governments address people's basic problems". The Lok Satta Party, he said, firmly believes that people can live with dignity and partake in wealth creation only when all forms of discrimination based on birth are eradicated.
It is possible when:
:: Quality education is made free and accessible to all
:: Free and comprehensive healthcare is guaranteed to all
:: Youth are empowered to participate in wealth creation through acquisition
of skills.
:: Incomes of people in traditional occupations like farming and weaving are enhanced
Dr. JP said it was a shame that a visiting British Prime Minister has to remind the Indian Prime Minister on the importance of universal and free primary education. "It is time that the politics of competitive populism and plunder gave way to politics of promoting human dignity." There should be a national debate on the appropriate anti-poverty schemes and the methods of their implementation.
Dr. JP pointed out how inefficiencies and corruption prevented even targeted people from availing of Government sops. For instance, the people covered by white cards in Andhra Pradesh exceeded the State's population. According to the Planning Commission and the National Sample Survey, only 16 per cent of people in Andhra Pradesh with a population of 80 million are below the poverty line. But Andhra Pradesh has more than 18 million families with white cards, accounting for a population of more than 80 million, assuming that each family has four and half members. "Yet, we hear that thousands of genuinely poor do not have white cards. Similarly, we hear pensions meant for widows, the aged and the handicapped as also houses under the INDIRAMMA scheme are cornered by the rich."
Even when the schemes reach deserving families, there is corruption every step of the way. Typically, Rs. 3000 is the bribe demanded for releasing money under housing programme for the poor. As Mr. Rajiv Gandhi once said, only 16 paisa is reaching the people on every rupee spent.
Dr JP called for a national debate on education and healthcare for all, and on ways of eradicating poverty and helping people stand on their own feet with dignity. "Political parties must shed self serving hypocricy and cynicism, and treat people as soverigns and citizens with self respect, not as vote banks and mendicants".

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Reply to questions on blogs

Please leave your mail IDs while posting a comment so that we can send you the response.

You can also write in your queries to info@loksattaparty.com.

Amarendra Reddy Sagila
(Research and Advocacy - Lok Satta Party)

Thursday, January 03, 2008

Comment on LSP's Position on Weightage and Dr. JP's Reply

Dear JP,

I appreciate your concern for the rural poor, and thank you for bringup some ideas (either good or bad).

I loathe YSR's true intentions of granting 4% reservation to muslims, and kcr braggings of 12% reservations to muslims. I absolutely agree with you that tinkering the reservation system for political gains trigger "kula kurukshetra" without a scientific study.

I see your commitment of adding 100 marks on a 1000 marks scale is hypocritical. You on one hand calls for a scientific study and on the other hand brings a random figure of 100 without any scientific study. Without stopping at that You are also suggesting the 100 marks idea as a panacea (gaurantees justice to all communities).

I see the other way. This 100 marks idea, further degrades/dilutes the amount of talent available in the country. Ambedkar has good intentions about the reservations, but failed to see in the long run it not good for any community (even to those who enjoy the reservations).


I think your idea is not a better one than Dr Ambedkar has envisioned.I think we have to address the issue at the cause not at the outcome. If rural poor is not getting good grades due to insufficient money provide them with scholarships. If the rural poor do not have access to the schools expand the education system and provide the access to schools. If the rural poor do not have good teachers recruit good teachers. If the teachers in rural area are not working well, then think of the ways how to make them accountable and think of ways to how to create competition among the schools, expand the private education system and create competing system that try to attract its customers (students).


I think 100 marks idea brings identical results of the ambedkar idea.Sincerely,Venkateswara Chowdary Penumuchu.

Sincerely,
Venkateswara Chowdary Penumuchu.


Dr. JP's Reply


Dear Sri Venkateswara Chowdary garu,

Thank you for the email. I agree with you on the need for quality education; but I disagree on the merits of a Weightage system as opposed to quotas.

1. Lok Satta Party is strongly and irrevocably committed to quality education upto 12th grade to all children, and higher education to all deserving students irrespective of means. Ultimately that is the solution to backwardness.

2. In the interim, there is a problem we need to address. Among groups included in affirmative action, only the better off are benefited. The result is caste wars: Gujjars vs Meenas; Malas vs Madigas etc. We need a policy framework to address this. A promise of eventual improvement of school education cannot put out these fires today. Equally, the rural and poor children from OCs are both angry and disillusioned. They need Weightage today.

3. Weightage, as opposed to quotas, encourages people to meet certain benchmarks. It is indeed hypocritical not to acknowledge that a rural or poor kid who may be brighter than a rich urban kid gets poor scores on account of poor schooling. And many such kids bloom later, if given a chance. They need both opportunity and hope. They cannot wait indefinitely in the hope that the next generation will have greater access to good schooling.

The 10% Weightage is arbitrary. Any number is bound to be arbitrary, and it needs to be decided on the basis of scientific surveys, and periodically revised. But Lok Satta is a political party; and in political communication you need tangible solutions for debate. The issue is not nitpicking on detail, but radically altering public and political attitudes on affirmative action.

With warm regards,


Jayaprakash Narayan
President

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

Reply to a Question on Dr. JP's comment about Modi Victory

Dear Lok Satta,

Being a staunch supporter of Lok Satta, I am very disappointed and disheartened reading Dr JP's statement today in Eenadu Internet edition regarding the election results in Gujarat. It says that Dr JP said people voted Modi for his 'honest governance'(nijayithi paalana).

After the recent Tehelka's tapes, some evidence of Modi's involvement by commission or omission in 2002 genocide is out. Rapists and murderers are still out free even after their own confessions (actually boasting) in front of the camera. Let alone apologising, Modi actually stuck to his hard core Hindutva campaign and directly or indirectly supported the 2002 genocide.

Modi is not corrupted, Modi is very efficient, Modi has developed his state, Modi has got enormous public support, Modi was elected democratically with a great majority and SO WAS HITLER. Should I say further?

I would rather prefer my country being poor and corrupted rather than being a rich but lawless state divided by religion or caste.

Honest governance is not simply a governance without scams. It also means not denying justice to any person in the name of religion or caste. It also means rulers speaking the truth.

Is Lok Satta aiming for Modi's governance?
I hope and I know that it is not. I would be very grateful if it is made clear.

Yours Sincerely
Siva
Dr. JP's Reply
Dear Siva,

Thank you for the email. Lok Satta has no intention to support communal agenda. The 2007 Gujarat verdict bucking the usual anti-incumbency trend and several local adverse factors needs to be interpreted in a citizen-friendly manner.
There can be two possible inferences of the verdict. First, hardcore Hindutva has won again. Second, it is unrelated to religious sentiments, and people responded to better delivery of services and reduced corruption. Clearly, the latter interpretation is both accurate, and is more likely to encourage parties to improve performance rather than polarize people on caste and communal lines. Such an interpretation in no way lets a government off the hook elsewhere. It merely emphasizes the importance of delivery to gain public support. The net result is a shift from communal agenda to development agenda. Clearly, genuine democratic governance and rule of law involve dignity, opportunity and justice. Lok Satta aims at all these. In today’s India, all three are at a premium and Gujarat reflects that deficit. Happily, there is no trade off between development and justice, and both need to go together. That we value development does not mean we value justice any less. Nor does it mean that poor development guarantees justice. We have to strive for both. That is our goal.


With warm regards,


Jayaprakash Narayan