Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Rehab deal for farmers won't stem suicides!

My fellow citizens,
The union government's announcement of the Rs.17,000 crore rehabilitation package for farmers in the 31 suicide-prone districts of AP, Karnataka, Kerala and Maharashtra focuses attention on the plight of agricultural sector in a fast-growing economy.

Emphasis on irrigation, interest waiver, watershed development, seed replacement and dairy industry is welcome.However, the deeper causes of agrarian crisis need to be critically examined and addressed.

Three fundamental long-term trends have led to the prolonged crisis.

First, agricultural commodity prices have been declining world-wide and in India for decades.

The recent growth spurt in global economy witnessed steep rise in the prices of industrial raw materials.But food prices are stagnant, as greater prosperity does not increase food consumption beyond a point, and higher production actually depresses prices.

Second, the restrictive trade and pricing policies of agricultural commodities had caused immense damage to farm sector for decades until the 90's, and weakened rural economy and farmers' capacity to withstand shocks.

Belated efforts to restore balance in the terms of trade coincided with accelerated shift to services, leading to neglect and decline of agriculture.

Third, the share of agriculture in the gross capital formation (GCF) fell dramatically over two decades from 15.4% in 1980-81 to 8% in 2001-02.

As a share of GDP, GCF in agriculture fell from 3.5% to 1.6% during this period.

The crisis has been aggravated by distorted priorities and irrational policies of governments over the years. Three examples will suffice.

Free power or un-metered power at fixed slab rates promoted excessive investment and over exploitation of ground water, and eventually led to water depletion, failed tube wells, indebtedness and impoverishment.

Stultifying state control and consequent corruption and cronyism in cooperatives undermined a potentially vibrant support system, denying farmers credit, quality inputs, market access, processing facilities, technology and management.

Undemocratic and unaccountable control of markets in most states denied farmers market intelligence and bargaining power, and made them vulnerable to money lenders, extortionists and mafias.


The misery of rural populace has been compounded by the criminal neglect and failure of state in education and healthcare. Even poor farmers and labourers are forced to spend huge sums out-of-pocket for indifferent private schooling and hospital costs. A high proportion of rural families incur huge debts at usurious interest rates to meet rising hospital costs, driving many to despair.


Even a casual glance at the comparative trends of GDP growth in farm and non-farm sectors indicates the magnitude and gravity of the crisis afflicting agriculture.

  • About 55% of the population dependent on agriculture shares only 20% of the GDP.
  • In effect, the income per capita of this vast population is only one-fifth of the rest of the people dependent on industry and services.
  • With agriculture growing at 2% and the rest of the economy recording over 9% annual growth, the share of agriculture is failing each year by almost 1% of GDP. If the current trends continue, agriculture's share of GDP will decline to about 14% by 2014.

Even maintenance of the income per capita differential of 5:1 between other sectors and agriculture would require a shift of about 11% of population from agriculture to non-agricultural occupations, reversing the current ratio of 55:45.

Given the slow rise in employment opportunities in non farm sector, such a huge occupational shift seems impossible; which means that agricultural incomes will register a further relative decline from the current ratio of 1:5!

Clearly, the majority of the population has no place in the growth bandwagon, making rapid growth unsustainable, and society and polity unstable.


The farm crisis needs a robust, all-out response from the Indian state. Certainly we need to invest heavily in agriculture, harness every drop of water, and enhance productivity through better inputs and extension. But much more needs to be done.


First, wherever farmers need protection from cheap imports, tariffs need to be raised. Cotton is a good example. Foreign governments are heavily subsidizing their cotton farmers, and Indian farmers are unable to compete because of low import duty. It is no accident that a large proportion of suicides are in cotton belt.


Second, national policies must be pursued in respect of ground water, cooperatives and markets. Judicious price incentives will remove distortions in ground water use, and democratization, member-control and competition will liberate the cooperatives and agricultural markets from the clutches of corrupt politicians and bureaucrats, and unscrupulous money lenders and mafias.


Third, the focus should be on value addition, particularly in case of perishable crops. Extreme price fluctuations and distress sales can easily be prevented by creating a network of processing industries, guaranteeing fair price to both farmers and consumers.


Fourth, a massive programme should be launched to promote high value crops like medicinal plants, and bio fuels. India is well-placed to take advantage of the next agricultural revolution in the offing, as both food and fuel will compete for the same land, with the end of the era of cheap oil.


Fifth, special attention needs to be paid to artisans, occupational groups, animal husbandry, poultry and fishery sectors. Agricultural crisis acutely affects the artisans and occupational groups in villages, and skills, credit, market linkages and a measure of social security to them are critical. Sixth, we need to develop urban amenities in rural areas and promote non-farm activities and services sector.


Finally, the state needs to focus on its core functions and guarantee good quality, accessible, free education and healthcare to all citizens.

Much of the rural distress is the consequence of state's failure in basic services.

We cannot sustain high growth rates, nor can we alleviate rural distress, without transforming our politics and governance.

9 comments:

  1. Well said JP! I appreciate your analysis and remedies to the current tragic situation of our farmers. Sometime back I was thinking on the same lines, how better we can improve our agriculture sector and stop farmer suicides.

    Here is my plan to government rehab deal package that how it shall judicially expend its 17,000 crore (more than 3 billion in US dollars) in those 31 districts.

    A SIX POINT AGENDA

    1> All the 31 districts should be made special economic zones so that each district takes to community farming i.e. farming huge tracts of land under each farming society where the farmers being the land owners will be partners in funding, cultivating and directly selling the farm products.

    Quite often, low productivity of Indian agriculture is attributed to small size of landholdings. Since small land holding is one of the reasons in low productivity, it is high time that we should go for farming huge tracts of land under each leadership of a farming society. Community farming demands huge farm machines, automobiles and skilled personnel in maintaining those machines. Indirectly we are paving way for another industry to grow with Agriculture.

    Let’s assign 20% for funding the farm machines if the farmers take to community farming. Initially government should have a share with private credit lending unions (or) bankers.

    2> Globally farming has become a science as itself, choosing right crops for a season, seed selection, cultivating methods, forecasting demand; marketing has all become fields of specialists and research. More agriculture research institutes and deemed universities should be placed around farming societies.
    The pursuit of those institutes has to center around agri research and helping the societies, than in pursuit of creating experts in cracking examinations like in the current education system.


    Let’s assign 10% in establishing those institutes around those community centers than in densely populated urban areas.


    3> Your final point talks about the free & quality good education and Health care to farmers, which every government has the responsibility to provide to its citizens, which of course seldom is on the point of agendas of our political parties. Bureaucracy and corruption is rampant in those government agencies. It is high time that government should bring in drastic new policies and accountability in those agencies.

    Let’s bring private players in maintaining those hospitals and health care services to people. Local bodies should have the power to release funds to the service provider depending on the quality of the service.


    Let’s assign 10% to bring reforms in health sector for those regions with construction of new medical centers around impoverished regions.


    4> 30% should be utilized in creating new energy resources (power plants etc) along with private entrepreneurs. It’s a shame on politicians and dangerous to the economy and to the country as a whole if the main political parties still linger on populist agendas (...free power, color TV’s).


    5> 20% should be used to bailout all the debt ridden farmers from the clutches
    of the credit lenders. It has become a vicious circle around their lives leading to tragic suicides.



    6> Finally remaining 10% should be used in setting up a Welfare fund, so that all unemployed in those areas should be on the pay roles till they find work.

    As concerned citizens we have greater responsibility towards our fellow citizens especially those who are for ages neglected. Living in a society is no longer safe & healthy if the fruits of growth are enjoyed by only few sections of the society.

    Consolidated Chart
    Community Farming - 20%
    Research Institutes - 10%
    Health & Education - 10%
    Debt bailout - 20%
    Energy - 30%
    Welfare Fund - 10%

    This is a lay man’s attempt planning for the utilization of the funds, I appreciate if any one tweak this chart a bit more with research.

    You can reach me at anilcu@yahoo.com Thx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear JP
    Well said! I just started taking interest in your articles and your work. You seem to provide simple practical solutions to the most painful probems inflicting our society. I hope government has open eyes and ears to those ideas.
    On the other hand, indian federal government seems to be interested in ushering in secong green revolution in the Indian agriculture. Ofcourse implementation of the idea is a big question as always.
    There is a department in a US university, Center for Advanced study of India (Univ of Pennsylvania), which does more study about India and Indian Policies then we do back in India.
    Check this Url http://www.sas.upenn.edu/casi/publications/india_in_transition.htm and the first document India's Second Green Revolution: The Sociopolitical Implications of Corporate - Led Agricultural Growth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. .' Foreign governments are heavily subsidizing their cotton farmers, and Indian farmers are unable to compete because of low import duty.'

    in other words, continue control of prices? what kind of a solution is that? we are one of the largest exporters of cotton now - do you want importing countries to react in the same manner?
    the subsidies the west uses to support its farmers are very cleverly designed - they're livelihood support systems rather than straightforward subsidies? so why don't we adopt a similar system of dole for our farmers instead of raising tariffs which could adversely affect them?
    and why do we need to support the cooperative credit system..when it'd be more healthier to let an organic banking system grow in the villages on its own? can you tell us whether the cooperative system has supported all the farmers' needs in our country (apart from some isolated districts)ever in the past?
    the final point you make - of promoting literacy, healthcare..and also of building urban amenities in the countryside , in my view, should instead be the first priority of our govt..not the last one.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Anil,
    Thank you for your response.The suggestions you made are logical and practical.

    The problem with government is that there is no integrated approach to problem solving.

    Flexibility,local control,integration and outcome monitoring are the keys.Let us all pursue these ideas and push forward the agenda for reform

    Warm regards

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dear Anonymous,
    Thank you for your interest in our blog and in the critical issues it tries to address.

    At first glance,India's problems seem so obdurate that most Indians consider attempts to solve or work towards solutions an exercise in futility.That the battle is lost even before an attempt is made,is a foregone conclusion in the collective Indian psyche.But...there are solutions!Simple,pragmatic and achievable.

    In our country,there is no dearth of solutions.We know what is good for us.Misplaced priorities and the lack of political will,which can be traced back to the disgraceful political culture and inappropriate electoral system we have at present,have led to the present state of affairs.As you rightly pointed out,implementation is our Achilles heel.We are past masters at planning!

    We are aware of, and do keep ourselves updated with the goings on at the Centre for Advanced Study of India,USA.Thank you for mentioning it.

    We are glad to note your concern and awareness level.Do keep in touch and let us know if there are other sources of valuable information on our country.We need all the support and help that we can get!

    With warm wishes

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dear Kuffir,
    Thank you for your response.

    WTO rules allow India to impose high tariffs in agriculture. All countries, including the developed ones, resort to this to protect agriculture.

    Cotton farmers constitute the largest agrarian group in distress. We already raised tariffs on edible oil to protect our oil seed farmers. We don't need to design complex agricultural subsidies which the Indian state cannot implement without leakages.

    Regarding cooperatives, throughout the world, member controlled cooperatives have been the key to farmers accessing credit, inputs, processing and markets.

    The state may or may not give support, but it should at least allow cooperatives to function independent of government. There is incontrovertible evidence of state bungling in cooperatives. For over thirty years the issue is being debated, and several committees- including Brahmaputra Committee-Rural Credit Survey Report, Planning Commission and Vaidyanathan Committee have urged liberalization of cooperatives. The UPA government even included it in its NCMP, but to no avail.

    The issue is not whether cooperatives have always been successful. The state simply has no business to control cooperatives, and this state- control is the chief cause of failure of co-operatives. This failure removed a vital safety net to farmers.

    Warm regards

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear Mr. Jayaprakash Narayan Sir,
    I am a software engineer working for IBM. You are putting lots of thoughts and actions to try to bring peace in India.

    One main point, I would like to bring to you is "MIUSED SO-CALLED EDUCATION". Education should lead people to stand on their own worth, than to create dependency on others.

    Current education is farse; in the sense that IT CREATES SLAVES, who work for multinational companies. IT CREATES DEATH, due to overly populated & polluted cities of India. The current situation is PEOPLE SELL their lands and properties for this MISUED EDUCATION; it might look WELL & FINE in the beginning, but as the passes on IT CREATES SLAVES...., who LEAVE THEIR home country to WORK IN OTHER COUNTRIES like Germany, US, Europe, etc. JUST FOR eating a PEACE OF BREAD.

    This is POOR SITUATION of India. People SAY, THERE IS OVERPOPULATION & less food; or FOOD PRICES are going up, etc. This is also farse. Our grandparents used to have 5 - 10 children and they used to maintain them without much trouble.

    One important point:
    ======================
    People are no more interested in God, who is supplying necessities to all living beings. You can confirmly understand about God from http://www.asitis.com; this is completely authentic information about God. Please do write to me at dtfo2006@yahoo.co.uk if you want to feedback on my comments.
    Thank you. Vijay.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi JP,

    What is ur stand on the separate telangana state issue.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Mr Narayan,

    I sincerely appreciate your efforts in not playing a blame game but really suggesting practicable solutions. Dear sir i am student LLB (Specialization in IPR). In a panel discussion at our college on the topic"Convergence of technologies for rapid development", presided by some very eminent people like one Dr Parikh,member Planning Commission, Dr. Narayan Murthy, Infosys etc, they had reiterated on a point again and again that " Technology should reach the poor in order to serve its purpose the best". I had a question which i couldn't air it at the discussion. Sir i would be highly obliged if u could let me know a possible solution to the following queries .

    Now with various international conventions regarding the recognition of intellectual property and fortunately or unfortunately India being a signatory to those like TRIPS, GATT etc, wont they have a negative effect on the country in a long run?

    Now sir with all this lobbying mostly by scientists and corporates, world over, for IP recognition, where would a mediocre or a poor Indian agriculturist stand when it comes to getting the technology for the betterment of his life?

    Now a major point in your blog that i feel you have stressed upon is "health care". But with this monopoly and a very similar pricing ,in what way can this health care really reach them?

    How can the government spend so much on it so as to advance the same to the needy?

    With this i want you to kindly let me know as to how the government can really and effectively tackle this problem?

    Can the existing IP policy be tampered with all those conventions above it?

    Now isnt this a policy which is in fact and essentially against public order? To serve the interest of a few why should the government sacrifice the greater interests of its subjects?

    It would be really very kind on your part to kindly throw some light on the same.

    Regards
    Shravanth
    paruchuri.shravanth@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete